In this guide we will discuss about : “Apple A18 Pro VS Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 : iPhone Takes the Lead Again” . That is why the battle has become even starker with the release of Apple’s A18 Pro chipset. What is the similarities and differences of this chip to Qualcomm’s recently released Snapdragon 8 Gen 3? In this case, to make a comparison with more precision, we will evaluate their specifications, performance, and even the general usage in the year 2024.
Table of Contents
Specs Comparison
Comparing the Apple A18 Pro with the Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, it is necessary to underscore that both platforms reveal a set of improvements in performance compared with the previous models. But they do not excel in every aspect – be it Peppy’s CPU architecture or Knight Capital’s GPUs.
| Apple A18 Pro | Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 |
|---|---|
| CPU | Six-core CPU (2+4) |
| GPU | 6-core GPU with hardware-accelerated Ray Tracing |
| Process | 3nm (N3E) by TSMC |
| Modem | Snapdragon X75 5G |
| Connectivity | Wi-Fi 7, Bluetooth 5.3 |
Apple A18 Pro VS Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 : Central Processing Unit
The next version of the Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 based on TSMC’s 4nm process, an octa-core CPU containing a 3GHz high-performance Cortex-X4 prime core. 3GHz. Still, the core structure is promising, yet the display leaves much to be desired when compared to the A18 Pro. In Geekbench 6. 3, the Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 has a single-core score of about 2,200 and the multi-core score of 6,985 and this will clearly indicate that there is a clear performance downgrad than the A18 Pro.
Apple A18 Pro VS Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 : GPU Comparison
Apple A18 Pro
Apple’s not shied away from optimising the 6-core GPU on the A18 Pro, although no architectural leap takes place, a shift up in clock speed and enhanced memory bandwidth allow for a 20% uplift over the A17 Pro we saw last year. In particular, Ray Tracing is rendered more fluidly thanks to new support for hardware acceleration; game control in graphically heavy games is not a concern on the A18 Pro.
Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
While the Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 of Qualcomm is utilizing Adreno 750 GPU to power the graphic processor. The Adreno 750 did relatively better as compared to the Apple A17 Pro; however, the A18 Pro has been beefed up even further and performs better in most of the benchmark tests. Nonetheless, the delta in actual gaming could very well differ because of how each gadget deals with heat and performance control.
Neural Processing Unit (NPU) and Intents & AI Expertise
Huawei’s chipsets are highly efficient in AI processing as is the case with Kirin 990 5G chipset. On this front, Apple’s A18 Pro delivers a 16-core Neural Engine that can perform 35 trillion operations per second, and on its side, Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 comprises the new Hexagon AI prime engine, which is believed to offer as much as 45 TOPS. Both the NPUs can support complex deep learning models, however, since Apple has deployed AI features such as real-time photography enhancements the Apple has the edge.
Memory Support and Bandwidth
The Apple A18 Pro comes with LPDDR5X memory up to 7500 MT/s and that means Apple’s chip has an upper hand over the Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 that can support LPDDR5X but it has a speed of 4. 8GHz. This yields to higher memory bandwidth which in turn enables better multitasking and efficient data handling especially in complex areas of computation.
Modem and Connectivity
Both the chipsets come equipped with Qualcomm’s Snapdragon X75 5G modem with download speeds of up to 10Gbps and upload speeds of up to 3Gbps. 5Gbps. Where 5G function is concerned, there’s no difference between the Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 and the Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, but the latter does support Local Bluetooth 5. 4 It is in this respect that A18 Pro boasts of Bluetooth 5 as compared to Bluetooth 5 from the earlier mentioned rivals. 3.
Power Efficiency and Thermal Management
Thanks to increased process technology with a 3nm node, the A18 Pro should be more energy-efficient than the Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, which is based on the 4nm node. Also, the graphite of the A18 Pro bottom layer enables better heat dissipation when performing demanding activities such as gaming – and these can be executed continuously without as much drop in performance.
Apple A18 Pro VS Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 : Real-World Performance
Apple A18 Pro: Real-World Performance Possible misinterpretations include that simulation results correlate with the theoretical model’s efficiency instead of the program’s actual effectiveness or that Report Generator appears significantly faster than it truly is if Test Run produces few reports while other tests generate more reports in shorter time.
The A18 Pro: Real World Performance
The A18 Pro, in the iPhone 16 Pro series excels in its daily usage where power and efficiency are needed, when operated under heavy tasks. Gaming, multitasking or video editing are possible on the A18 Pro and all these tasks are smoothly done. The phenomena of higher clock speeds and better dissipating heat delivery enhance the stability of the product.
Snapdragon 8 Gen 3: Real World Performance
Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 also features high efficiency in Android flagship devices in the truest sense of the word. However, one huge drawback can be the heat which can become quite an issue during intensive gaming or other computation-related activities. That is why in some tests, it may throttle more than the A18 Pro because of thermal performance which is typical for the Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 chipset.
Read More : “How to Install macOS Sequoia Free: Without Apple Developer Account!“
Conclusion
As you will see in this Apple A18 Pro vs Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 comparison, the iPhone 16 Pro’s newly-released A18 Pro chipset outperforms the rival SoC in most aspects. It’s faster CPU, efficient 3nm process and an improved GPU makes it the go-to choice for those looking for a performance-oriented device. Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 although is a very good chip may not get there until the Snapdragon 8 Gen 4.
FAQs
To which chipset is it better to lean in the aspect of gaming – A18 Pro or Snapdragon 8 Gen 3?
In terms of overall performance, the chipsets are great but the A18 Pro is better when it comes to its sustained performance that is attributed to great thermals.
Is the Neural Engine of the A18 Pro better and faster than Snapdragon 8 Gen 3’s Hexagon AI Engine?
The Neural Engine in the A18 Pro is among the fastest and the Hexagon AI engine in Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 provides higher TOPS although in real life applications it may be different.
The A18 Pro’s CPU is supposedly 15% faster than the Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, but it was not specified what percentage of this leap it constitutes?
According to the Geekbench scores the A18 Pro is nearly 50% faster than the Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 both in single core and multi core.
As of these two chipsets, which is power efficient?
When it comes to efficiency, the Apple A18 Pro in its use of a 3nm manufacturing process is more efficient that the Snapdragon 8 Gen 3.
Can Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 bridging the gap between Apple’s A18 Pro’s performance?
While the upcoming Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 is likely to reduce this distance it remains to be seen if it will actually better apple’s A18 Pro in terms of raw performance.
